To contact us Click HERE
To contact us Click HERE For a good look at the sign that may have caused the sign battle in October in District One, take a look at this article on First Electric Newspaper.
It seems that when the property owner made a deal with the owner of the signpost and billboard out front at 1075 W. Algonquin Rd. (just east of Pyott Rd.), in Algonquin, the fine print in the contract precluded him from allowing any political sign of an opponent.
Frankly, I'm wondering about the legality and ethics of such a contract provision if, indeed, it is part of the contract. When the sign post and platform were erected, did the sign company really know that, at some time in the future, political advertising might be sold on the sign, such as Bob Bless' ad shown in the photograph?
Cannot a person continue to possess his First Amendment rights, or can they be signed away in a contract?
That is the property where Nick Chirikos got permission to place his signs. That's the property where Steve the Enforcer chose to take issue with Nick's sign. And where Steve was arrested. And then un-arrested.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder